Nature Climate Standard
MethodologiesModulesGovernance
English
English
  • Nature Climate Standard
    • Preamble
    • 1. Introduction
      • 1.1 Scope
      • 1.2 Versioning
    • 2. Methodology Requirements
      • 2.1 Methodology Certification Process
      • 2.2 Consultation Requirements
      • 2.3 Modular Framework
      • 2.4 Updates to Methodologies
      • 2.5 Methodology Contents
      • 2.6 Grandfathering of Existing Projects
    • 3. Project Requirements
      • 3.1 Ownership
      • 3.2 Documentation
      • 3.3 Eligibility
      • 3.4 Project Crediting
      • 3.5 Stakeholder Input Process
      • 3.6 Regulatory Compliance
      • 3.7 Environmental and Social Impacts
      • 3.8 Transparency
      • 3.9 Early Termination by the Project Proponent
    • 4. Validation and Verification Requirements
      • 4.1 Validation and Verification Body Requirements
      • 4.2 Validation and Verification Process
      • 4.3 Materiality Threshold
      • 4.4 Conflicts of interest
      • 4.5 Rotation of Validation and Verification Bodies
      • 4.6 Validation and Verification Body Oversight
    • 5. Crediting
      • 5.1 Credit Attributes
      • 5.2 Issuance Process
      • 5.3 Transfer and Delivery Rules and Ownership History
      • 5.4 Retirement Rules
      • 5.5 Retirement Certificates
      • 5.6 Reversals and Buffer Pools
      • 5.7 No Double Counting
    • 6. Glossary
  • Feedback on the Standard
Powered by GitBook

© 2024 Nature Value Consortium

On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Nature Climate Standard
  2. 4. Validation and Verification Requirements

4.3 Materiality Threshold

Previous4.2 Validation and Verification ProcessNext4.4 Conflicts of interest

Last updated 6 months ago

The threshold for materiality is 5% for all Projects. The discrepancy between reported mitigation outcomes and what the auditor determines to be the real mitigation outcomes must not exceed this threshold.

Materiality issues can also be of a qualitative nature. These can be identified and documented, such as:

  • control issues that erode the verifiers confidence in the reported data;

  • poorly managed documentation;

  • difficulty in locating requested information.

If a project is found to be overcrediting, after credits have been issued, see the NCS policy on reversals ().

5.6